Q.President Donald Trump has pledged to recognize Israeli sovereignty over the Golan Heights. Introduce briefly the strategic importance of Golan heights,and reason for dispute in the region.Also discuss the impact of US's changed stance in the region and wider world.(250 words)
Answer :
Approach
- Introduce briefly by highlighting the dispute.
- Bring out the strategic importance of Golan Heights.
- Describe impact of US’s changed stance.
Answer
Introduction
- The Golan Heights are a fertile plateau of around 1,300 sq km area lying to the north and east of the Sea of Galilee, which Israel seized from Syria during the Six-Day War of 1967, and has occupied ever since.
Body
Strategic Importance of Golan Heights
- The Golan overlooks both Israel and Syria, and offers a commanding military vantage.Israel argues that Golan is a security buffer against the war in Syria. Syrian artillery regularly shelled the whole of northern Israel from 1948 to 1967 when Syria controlled the Heights.
- The topography provides a natural bufferagainst any military thrust from Syria.
- The area is also akey source of water for an arid region. Rainwater from the Golan's catchment feeds into the Jordan River. The area provides a third of Israel's water supply.
- The land is fertile, and the volcanic soil is used to cultivate vineyards and orchards and raise cattle. The Golan is also home to Israel's only ski resort.
|
1-The primary approach to solving the conflict today is a so-called “two-state solution” that would establish Palestine as an independent state in Gaza and most of the West Bank, leaving the rest of the land to Israel. Though the two-state plan is clear in theory, the two sides are still deeply divided over how to make it work in practice. 2-The alternative to a two-state solution is a “one-state solution,” wherein all of the land becomes either one big Israel or one big Palestine. Most observers think this would cause more problems than it would solve, but this outcome is becoming more likely over time for political and demographic reasons.
|
Impact of US’s changed stance in the region and wider world
- USA’s recognition marked a reversal of decades of US policy, which has refused to condone the Israeli occupation of Golan, and urged that the dispute must be resolved diplomatically.
- US recognition now legitimized the occupation of territory through force; such recognition can lead to countries involved in territorial disputes using aggression to settle their claims thus endangering peace at regional as well as global level.
- It runs counter to international law, which does not recognise Israeli sovereignty over territories occupied during the 1967 War.
- Even though US move is symbolic, rather than legal, but given the US’s global influence, recognition could lend some legitimacy to Israel’s controversial annexation policy.
- Arab countries described the declaration as a clear violation of the U.N. Charter and of international law. US action is blow to peace process in the region.
- There are chances of increasing conflict between Iran and US due to this recognition by US. Thus destabilizing entire Arab region which may have impact on Oil production in region causing Oil prices to high negatively impacting oil importers like India.
Conclusion
- US current approach to contentious issues in the Arab-Israeli conflict will further undermine the US government’s claim to be an honest broker. US has significant global influence by condoning aggression, the current administration has undermined the process of peace in Middle east.
- The outstanding disputes for regions and wider Israel- Palestine dispute should be dealt with in realm of international laws and through peaceful negotiations.